dtrace progress 20080530 .. so close ! | Saturday, 31 May 2008 |
I had issues getting to the DTRACEIOC_ENABLE ioctl - after a bit of head scratching, this was resolved, and now we get to DTRACEIOC_GO.
Even better, we get past DTRACEIOC_GO.
What does this mean?
It means the dtrace binary talks to the kernel, can pass any D script in, and then wait for the buffered information to be made available.
I found out again, my dtrace.c kernel code was outdated, so spent some time merging the latest OpenSolaris code in - still some stuff to merge, but lots of useful things in there, such as 128-bit arithmetic for tracking big counters, and some validation checks on the way memory is accessed. (Validating memory doesnt help me, because i default to enabling probing to anywhere - need to fix this at some point so that hackers and accidents can't bring the system down).
Now we are past the DTRACEIOC_GO, i found some issues with userland dtrace - stubs i hadnt coded. Thats partially done (gethrtime() and a partial pthread cond wait function).
Heres an example 'session':
/home/fox/src/dtrace/drivers/dtrace@vmubuntu: dtrace -v -f journal_invalidatepage dtrace: description 'journal_invalidatepage' matched 6 probesStability attributes for description journal_invalidatepage:
Minimum Probe Description Attributes Identifier Names: Unstable Data Semantics: Unstable Dependency Class: Common
Minimum Statement Attributes Identifier Names: Stable Data Semantics: Stable Dependency Class: Common
Not much to look at - i get no output, even after Ctrl-C. (Plus that arbitrary probe isnt interesting really).
I believe we are now firmly in phase 3 of the task: phase I was to build dtrace cmd + driver. Phase II was to get to a point where we dont crash the kernel and the userland command is functional.
Phase III is the point where the whole thing can actually start reporting something/anything.
Phase IV will be examination of SDT an PID providers so we can do really useful stuff.
Stay tuned.
PS I make releases each night if i feel there is progress or important bug fix.es
http://www.crisp.demon.co.uk/tools.html
Dtrace for Linux .. Progress | Thursday, 22 May 2008 |
Anyway, back at the dtrace camp - some progress. The startup code is wrong in the kernel - my driver was missing some of the subtlety of the dtrace_attach()/dtrace_open() code, so by the time cmd/dtrace tries to do an ioctl(DTRACE_ENABLE), we hit some null pointers.
I've now protected myself against this. (Such a kernel panic causes a reboot to be required); I know what i need to debug, just some more linux kernel searching to validate I am calling the correct api (dev_set_drvdata).
Had a near panic last night when my vmware/ubuntu refused to boot. I think ubuntu screwed up the /boot/grub/menu.lst - so i was booting a virgin kernel without an initrd ram disk. Fortunately, one of the many menu items was available, so i have been able to make more progress.
dtrace progress 20080519 | Monday, 19 May 2008 |
Am spending (too much) time investigating why Ubuntu bison/flex combination doesnt work compared to Fedora 8 bison/flex.
Unfortunately, these tools shoot themselves in the foot - they try to be compatible with old yacc/lex, but are just sufficiently different that a trivial issue becomes very difficult to debug.
Have always disliked lex since it provides so little utility, and debugging it - especially when the lex definition 'just works'.
I can see Apple, in the Darwin code, have hit the same issue, but somehow my issue is very subtle.
Oh well.
Once the portability issue is resolved, I can go back to the driver and just move things along, before I forget how this all works.
dtrace progress | Sunday, 11 May 2008 |
Finally able to access the modules and kallsyms to find /dev/fbt entry points to patch in the kernel. This is definitely a milestone - as now, in theory, dtrace can start patching the kernel to insert probes. I have yet to try this - next on my list, to see what actually happens.
Note that we only seem to have a subset of available kernel probes because -- I dont know! Maybe these are the only modules I am loading, and appear to be missing the kernel syms (maybe I need to modify the fbt driver to not just enumerate every module, but to enumerate every kernel/kallsyms entry).
But this gives a huge blast to move forward and start debugging D scripts.
I have truncated the output below - its showing 515 probe points in the kernel (a stripped down linux 2.6.24-4 kernel).
ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME 1 dtrace BEGIN 2 dtrace END 3 dtrace ERROR 4 fbt dtracedrv ctf_close entry 5 fbt dtracedrv ctf_close return 6 fbt dtracedrv ctf_func_args entry 7 fbt dtracedrv ctf_func_args return 8 fbt freq_table cpufreq_frequency_table_target entry 9 fbt freq_table cpufreq_frequency_table_target return 10 fbt dock register_hotplug_dock_device entry 11 fbt dock register_hotplug_dock_device return 12 fbt dock unregister_hotplug_dock_device entry 13 fbt dock unregister_hotplug_dock_device return 14 fbt parport_pc parport_pc_unregister_port entry 15 fbt parport_pc parport_pc_probe_port entry 16 fbt parport_pc parport_pc_probe_port return 17 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_ecp_read_data entry 18 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_ecp_read_data return 19 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_epp_read_data entry 20 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_epp_read_data return 21 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_read_nibble entry 22 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_read_nibble return 23 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_read_byte entry 24 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_read_byte return 25 fbt parport parport_wait_event entry 26 fbt parport parport_wait_event return 27 fbt parport parport_register_driver entry 28 fbt parport parport_register_driver return 29 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_epp_read_addr entry 30 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_epp_read_addr return 31 fbt parport parport_release entry 32 fbt parport parport_announce_port entry 33 fbt parport parport_unregister_device entry 34 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_write_compat entry 35 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_write_compat return 36 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_epp_write_data entry 37 fbt parport parport_unregister_driver entry 38 fbt parport parport_put_port entry 39 fbt parport parport_put_port return 40 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_epp_write_addr entry 41 fbt parport parport_remove_port entry 42 fbt parport parport_remove_port return 43 fbt parport parport_register_port entry 44 fbt parport parport_register_port return 45 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_ecp_write_addr entry 46 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_ecp_write_addr return 47 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_ecp_write_data entry 48 fbt parport parport_ieee1284_ecp_write_data return 49 fbt i2c_core i2c_new_device entry 50 fbt i2c_core i2c_new_device return 51 fbt i2c_core i2c_probe entry 52 fbt i2c_core i2c_probe return 53 fbt i2c_core i2c_add_numbered_adapter entry 54 fbt i2c_core i2c_add_numbered_adapter return ...
dtrace progress - at last ! | Saturday, 10 May 2008 |
$ dtrace -l ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME 1 dtrace BEGIN 2 dtrace END 3 dtrace ERROR
Hooray! We went thru a ton of code in the kernel to dig that out! Now -- to find out what happened to my /dev/fbt entries...
dtrace for linux progress 20080505 | Monday, 05 May 2008 |
I have decided to consolidate the four drivers into a single dtracedrv.ko driver, to avoid lots of fluff with inter-driver symbol resolution. Having separate drivers causes issues at link-time and leads to a hairy order of dependency as the modules are loaded.
Now we have a single dtracedrv.ko.
Any why is is dtracedrv.ko and not dtrace.ko ?!
Because i havent finished getting the makefiles to work. There is a file called dtrace.c which has most of the kernel guts in it - but not all of it, and the linux kbuild software gets confused if i want my driver to be called by the same name as a dependent source file.
I have also added changed-line support to CRiSP whilst I am at it. Someone had asked for the ability to add a comment in column 73 of a line that is modified (presumably COBOL or Fortran code), and this nearly works. Just need to add the setup menus.
Now...off to get 'dtrace -l' to give me something to probe !
dtrace progress 20080504 | Sunday, 04 May 2008 |
/dev/fbt is used to allow monitoring around all functions in the kernel, by establishing probes on the entry and exit from a function. This, in theory, gives rise to thousands of probes. (/dev/sdt is needed for high level actions like process fork/death, etc - and will come later).
The GPL/CDDL issue in fbt is resolved by using a helper from user land to allow investigation of the running kernel.
The main thing to get to now is to see if the full dtrace userland path can be executed - eg, for 'dtrace -l' to work to see some probes, and then try some simple D scripts to see if the right things happen.
The pid provider will be needed to get access to current process properties, and hopefully wont be a big deal.
To date, the only kernel expectation is that we have reasonable compile defaults (eg modules, kallsyms, etc) and we havent had to touch or break the kernel.
dtrace wont compile without access to the running kernel sources, but its beginning to look good.